Good to see the old Perth "no" reflex getting challenged and, in this case, beaten.
The environmental umpire said "nothing to see here" yet local residents apparently knew better.
And that's what the court has found - that you don't own views and you don't own adjacent parkland. They're public assets and the public interest will be served in the use of them.
I don't know why so many Perth people have trouble understanding that their property ends at their fence.
Maybe now they will.